/
CommStyle
← Suite
0 / 5
Org360 ↗
✦ Communication Style Assessment
🌱 Brand new — your feedback shapes it

How you talk.
How they hear.
The gap between.

36 questions designed to map your genuine communication style — not what you aspire to, but how you actually show up. You'll get a personalised profile, a stress signature, and a practical guide for working with everyone who isn't like you.

⏱ ~12 minutes
🧠 AI-powered analysis
🔒 Answers stay in your browser
✦ Honesty makes it more useful
🔬 Analyst
Logic & precision
🧭 Advocate
Values & conviction
🧨 Explorer
Energy & creativity
⚡ Driver
Action & results
🤝 Connector
Warmth & belonging
🌌 Visionary
Reflection & imagination
CommStyle is a brand new framework. We've built it carefully, but we know it will improve with real-world use. If your results feel off, or something doesn't resonate, please — it directly shapes the next version.
Before We Begin
One question to set the frame.
Think of a recent conversation that felt genuinely natural and easy — not a work task or project, but the actual interaction itself. The way you were talking, connecting, exchanging. How would you describe how you were communicating in that moment?
Choose the option that best captures that natural feeling:
Block 01 / 05 — How You Think
The way you process the world.
Rate each statement on how much it describes you — honestly, not aspirationally.
Q1 When a plan isn't clearly laid out, I find it genuinely hard to move forward.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q2 I find it hard to stay quiet when I see something I believe is wrong.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q3 I tend to liven up the atmosphere in a room without particularly trying.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q4 I get impatient in meetings that could have been resolved in five minutes.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q5 I notice when someone in a group is feeling left out or uncomfortable, even when nothing is said.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q6 I do my clearest thinking when I'm alone rather than in a group.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q7 I tend to notice errors or inconsistencies that others walk straight past.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q8 I keep my commitments even when it would be easier not to.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Block 02 / 05 — How You Communicate
Your natural style in action.
Think of real situations — not what you think you should do, but what you actually tend to do.
Q9 I find detailed, step-by-step processes tedious and hard to sustain.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q10 I make decisions quickly and I'm comfortable adjusting if I turn out to be wrong.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q11 I find it hard to focus on work when there's unresolved tension with someone I care about.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q12 I often arrive at solutions by sitting with a problem quietly rather than talking it through.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q13 I prefer to have all the relevant information before giving my view.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q14 I lose respect for people who compromise their principles under pressure.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q15 I come up with ideas quickly — sometimes faster than I can evaluate them.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q16 I'm energised by high-pressure situations rather than worn down by them.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Block 03 / 05 — What Drives You
Motivation, values, and identity.
These questions get at what actually energises you — not what should.
Q17 I remember personal details about people — what they're going through, what they care about.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q18 People sometimes have to wait for my response — I like to sit with things before I answer.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q19 People have told me I ask too many questions before committing to action.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q20 I'm known for having strong views — and for expressing them.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q21 Humour is one of the main ways I connect with people.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q22 I tend to push conversations toward a decision rather than letting them drift.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q23 I often put others' needs ahead of my own in group situations, sometimes to my own cost.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q24 I'm more interested in ideas and possibilities than in immediate practical steps.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Block 04 / 05 — How You Work
Environment, pace, and pressure.
Some of these will be uncomfortable to agree with. That's fine — it's where the useful data lives.
Q25 I find conversations that jump between topics without structure draining.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q26 I think about the long-term implications of decisions more than most people around me.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q27 I've been told I'm unpredictable or hard to pin down.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q28 People sometimes find me blunt — I take that as a reasonable trade-off.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q29 I'm more comfortable in collaborative settings than competitive ones.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q30 I can lose track of time when I'm deep in thought on something that absorbs me.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q31 I'm more comfortable in situations where roles and expectations are clearly defined.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q32 I need the work I do to connect to something I genuinely believe matters.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Block 05 / 05 — Reflection
Four last statements, then three open questions.
The open questions are what make the AI analysis genuinely personalised. The more specific you are, the more useful the report.
Q33 I'd rather try something and fail than plan it to death and never start.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q34 I'm more interested in what works than in the process used to get there.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q35 I can sense how a conversation is going emotionally, even when the words say otherwise.
Not like me at allVery much like me
Q36 I find back-to-back social or collaborative activity genuinely tiring.
Not like me at allVery much like me
OT1 Describe a recent conversation or collaboration that felt genuinely good. What made it work?
OT2 Describe a situation where communication broke down or frustrated you. What happened — and what was your role in it? optional
OT3 What do people most often get wrong about how you communicate — what do they misread or misinterpret about you? optional

All 36 questions answered. Ready to generate your communication profile?

Mapping your communication style…

This takes about 20–30 seconds. Two AI models are analysing your responses.

Processing your 36 responses
Calculating your Communication Stack
Analysing your open text responses
Building your stress signature
Generating your adaptation guide
Finalising your profile
✦ Your CommStyle Profile

Your Communication Profile

Personalised from your 36 responses

Part II — Adaptation Intelligence
Working with everyone else.
How to adjust your style for each communication type.
Did you find this useful? This tool is free — help us keep building it.
Support us ✨
✦ About CommStyle

Understanding the method.

CommStyle maps how you naturally communicate — not your full personality, and not how you behave at work — but specifically how you connect, exchange, and interact with other people. This page explains how the assessment works, what it measures, and how the report is produced.
What is it for?
👤 Individuals
A precise, honest picture of your communication style — what comes naturally, what drains you, how you behave under stress, and what colleagues often misread about you.
👥 Teams
A shared language. When everyone knows their profile and can see each other's, friction becomes explainable and bridgeable rather than personal.
🎓 Coaches
A structured starting point for communication coaching, team workshops, and conflict resolution. Released under CC BY-SA — free to use with clients.
The six archetypes

Every person contains all six orientations. CommStyle maps which are most active and accessible for you — and which require more effort. A high score means that energy is present in you; it does not mean you communicate in that style in every context.

🔬
The Analyst
Logic · Clarity · Structure
Analysts process the world through frameworks and evidence. They communicate precisely, ask thorough questions before committing, and need time to think before responding. They bring rigour and reliability to teams, and are drained by vagueness, rushed decisions, and conversations that jump without structure. Under stress they over-explain, become critical of others' reasoning, and in extreme cases disengage entirely.
Psychological need: recognition for the quality of their thinking.
🧭
The Advocate
Values · Integrity · Conviction
Advocates organise their world around what they believe matters. They communicate with conviction, follow through on commitments, and notice when something is out of step with shared values. They inspire trust through consistency, and are drained by ethical shortcuts and people who say one thing and do another. Under stress they push their views harder, become preachy, and at their limit can become dogmatic and bridge-burning.
Psychological need: recognition for their convictions and dedication.
🧨
The Explorer
Spontaneity · Creativity · Energy
Explorers engage with the world through play, humour, and creative energy. They generate ideas quickly, liven up rooms without trying, and communicate best through energetic, experiential exchange. They are drained by rigid processes and long lectures. Under stress they seek attention, become distracting, and at their limit can sabotage processes or exit without explanation.
Psychological need: playful contact and stimulating environments.
The Driver
Action · Results · Directness
Drivers are energised by high stakes and fast decisions. They communicate bottom-line first, move conversations toward resolution, and take bluntness as a reasonable trade-off for efficiency. They are drained by slow processes and circular discussions. Under stress they create unnecessary conflict and at their limit can become ruthless. Note: high Driver scores often reflect work pace or action-orientation rather than interpersonal communication style — the report accounts for this explicitly.
Psychological need: challenge and stimulation.
🤝
The Connector
Warmth · Relationships · Belonging
Connectors build and sustain relationships as their primary mode of being. They notice emotional undercurrents, remember what people are going through, and communicate best when the human dimension is acknowledged before the task. They are drained by cold transactional environments and being valued only for output. Under stress they over-adapt, become passive-aggressive, and at their limit can either shut down or express long-suppressed grievances all at once.
Psychological need: unconditional appreciation as a person, not just for performance.
🌌
The Visionary
Reflection · Imagination · Depth
Visionaries do their best thinking alone, in unhurried space. They communicate thoughtfully when given room to process, often prefer writing to real-time conversation, and are most alive in discussions that explore ideas rather than resolve action items. They are drained by being put on the spot, constant collaboration, and vague expectations. Under stress they withdraw, wait passively, and at their limit disengage entirely — sometimes disappearing without explanation.
Psychological need: solitude and clear, gentle direction.
How scoring works

CommStyle uses 36 Likert-scale items — six statements per archetype, rated 1 to 5 on how well each describes you. Raw scores (max 30 per archetype) are normalised to 0–100. All six scores are shown as a profile, not a ranked hierarchy.

Important: a high score means that orientation is present and active in you. It does not mean you communicate in that style in every context. The same person can score highly on Driver (action-oriented) and Connector (warm, relational) — these may operate in entirely different settings. The report is designed to hold this complexity rather than flatten it into a simple ranking.

How the report is produced
01
Your framing question answer — before the rated items, you identify the communication style that felt most natural in a recent real conversation. This is treated as the strongest signal of your communication identity and is weighted above scores when they conflict.
02
Your six archetype scores — the numerical profile from the 36 Likert items, providing a map of which orientations are most active in you.
03
Your open-text responses — three questions about a positive communication experience, a breakdown, and what people typically misread about you. These are treated as ground truth: if your stories point in a different direction from your scores, the narrative follows the stories.
04
AI analysis — all three inputs are sent to Claude (by Anthropic) with detailed interpretation rules. These include specific handling for common tension pairings (such as high Connector + high Driver) that produce misleading results if interpreted naively, and explicit instructions not to conflate work behaviour with communication identity.
05
Adaptation guide — a second AI call produces personalised advice for communicating with each of the six archetypes, tailored specifically to your profile.
Research foundations

CommStyle synthesises research from several established frameworks. It is inspired by their logic but is independently written — no proprietary content from any of these sources has been reproduced.

Process Communication Model (PCM)Taibi Kahler's model of six personality types, psychological needs, and stress sequences. CommStyle's archetypes are inspired by PCM logic but independently defined.
Big Five Personality ResearchParticularly openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness as they relate to interpersonal communication style.
Self-Determination TheoryDeci & Ryan's distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as it shapes communication needs and psychological drivers.
Transactional AnalysisCommunication channels, psychological needs, and ego state theory as a foundation for understanding interaction patterns.
Licence & attribution
CommStyle v1.0 · © Daniele D'Esposito
Released under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

You are free to use, share, and adapt CommStyle — including commercially — provided you attribute the original work and release any derivatives under the same licence. CommStyle is part of the Org360 suite of people intelligence tools.
Share your feedback
What's working? What's not? Every message is read personally.